“inexcusable inaction of doctors and illogical not to have done further study”. And also “we were not given exhaustive explanations and convincing the Stefano Cucchi .” These are the reasons of the Supreme Court according to which on 15 December was placed a call-bis manslaughter and were annulled the acquittals of five doctors Pertini hospital. They were however definitively acquitted instead three prison officers, the doctor who first visited Cucchi and the three finished nurses under the procedure.
According to the Supreme Court, the text reads, doctors at the hospital Pertini had a “guarantee” to protect the health of Cucchi and their first duty was to diagnose “precisely” his condition even in the presence of a “complex situation that can not justify inaction healthcare or its misdiagnosis. ” In 57 pages filed Wednesday, March 9 by judges, are contained also in the motives of the acquittal of the three officers prisons involved in the story: according to the judges in fact given the “multiple critical testimony” that the young man ” was assaulted by members to the carabinieri Corps “and then” before being taken over by the prison stretches for trial “of police officers is to exclude the involvement of the penitentiary agents.
the document said: then they have not been provided “ exhaustive explanations and convincing the death”, which is why in the process along with a cause of death, must also be ascertained “concreated the organization of the structure, with emphasis on the roles , the competence spheres and the powers and duties of the doctors involved in the affair. ” The whole “without forgetting that the doctor who, within a structure of this kind, is of top functions holds a weighty obligation to guarantee and is therefore responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the diagnosis made and treatment offered to the patients “.
Get involved in the process a primary Aldo Fierro, Stefania Corbi, Bruno Flaminia, Luigi De Marchis and Silvia Di Carlo . According to the verdict, pathological states of Cucchi, preexisting and concomitant with politraumatismo for which he was admitted, would have to impose “ increased focus and depth “, with recourse to. “Differential diagnosis”
the judges also write that it is the “ manifest illogic ” the decision by which the Court of Rome of Appeal sat in the trial for the death of Stefano Cucchi , “excluded to carry out a new assessment expert” claiming that “no residual aspects of the physical Cucchi conditions have not already been explored and assessed by the appointed experts.” So a new assessment “for the impressive size of the evidence on the file” could have been carrying on the acts themselves, “even taking advantage of the contributions made by different experts” and can not be prevented only by “established” – by the judges of ‘ appeal – “unable to make findings on Cucchi corpse”. On the causes of death of Cucchi, he writes the Supreme Court by sharing the words used in his indictment by Pg Nello Rossi , there can be “a kind of ‘cognitive performance’ ‘. For the judges notice was well argued, by the trial judges who had condemned the Pertini physicians, determining the cause of death of the young in the inanition syndrome , death by starvation in a subject already underweight and polytrauma.
->
0 komentar:
Post a Comment